This is the
second part of a series
showing how several widely accepted false teachings in the Church have helped
to create the current political situation in America – that is, being on the
verge of accepting fascism. The teachings being examined largely contradict the
most fundamental commandment of scripture - to love your neighbor as yourself. Mat 22:37
What is
dispensationalism?
Dispensationalism
is one of the core doctrines of the American right-wing political church. As
such, it has had a far-reaching impact on the American political landscape. Many
of the “end-time” apocalyptic beliefs that many American Christians have come
to accept as indisputable truths were only conceived after 1830 by the inventor
of dispensationalism, John Nelson Darby.
Definition
The word
dispensation (to dispense) means to give, provide, or distribute goods /
services to people. Darby arbitrarily divided the BIBLE timeline into 7
eras or dispensations; claiming that GOD had a different way of dispensing salvation
to people during each era. His bottom line being that the Jews don’t need to
accept JESUS to be saved. One BIBLE verse, lamely taken out of context, was/is
used to legitimize the whole scheme: “Study to show thyself approved unto God,
a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”
2 Tim 2:15 The original verse means to study the word and interpret it
correctly – it has nothing to do with breaking history down into arbitrary
divisions.
Scofield’s
“Bible”
Dispensationalism
was popularized and became part and parcel of American fundamentalist Christianity
upon the release of C.I. Scofield’s Scofield Reference Bible Notes in 1909.
Scofield’s “Bible”
was/is a King James Bible that added commentary notes written in plain
English. The notes promoted fundamentalism and dispensationalism at a time when
conservative Christians felt that their values were under attack by modernism. Unfortunately,
for many Americans, those “values” included anti-black racism expressed through
segregation and disenfranchisement – thus keeping America’s long history of christianized hypocrisy intact. *See the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary’s
Report on Slavery and Racism for a shocking description of the racist values held
by many conservative “Christian” theologians in the early 1900’s.
Heresy
There is so
much wrong with dispensationalism – so many specifics that contradict the BIBLE
– that I can only realistically address a few of the most egregiously heretical
aspects.
Uninspired
commentary
Scofield’s
bible was the first Bible that had been published in over 300 years that had
uninspired commentary notes presented on the same pages as inspired scripture. At
the time, many considered this to be blasphemous because it encouraged readers
to accept Scofield’s twisted interpretations as being equal to scripture.
The
Gospel not meant for the Church (?!!)
Scofield
claimed that the Gospel, as taught by JESUS, was (mostly) not meant for the
Christian Church (!) IMO, this is the most outrageous claim ever made by dispensationalists.
The original dispensational teaching was/is that JESUS’ ministry and teaching
was to the Jews – that the doctrines meant for the church are only outlined in
the letters of Paul. IOW, classical dispensationalism claims that JESUS and
Paul are teaching two different gospels. This is a blasphemous contradiction of
scripture.
Scofield intimates
that the Sermon on the Mount (where JESUS outlines what it is to be a true Christian) is Old
Testament law. He says that JESUS’ commandments will not be in effect again
until it is the law for a supposed (exclusively) Jewish millennial kingdom on earth –
after the Christians have been raptured to their kingdom in heaven! Note
that this doctrine was widely denounced by mainline churches as an outright
rejection of JESUS’ commandments.
Scofield’s
note at Mat 5:2 discusses the Sermon on the Mount and then states:
“…For these reasons, the Sermon on the Mount in
its primary application gives neither the privilege nor the duty of the
Church. These (commandments to the church) are found in the Epistles.”
IOW, it doesn’t apply to the modern Christian church. In his
notes for Ephesians 3, after a somewhat self-contradictory interpretation of Eph 3:6 - where he
has to talk around the fact that Paul says that the church is one body of
people composed of Jews and Gentiles, Scofield goes on to say:
“In his (Paul’s) writings
alone we find the doctrine, position, walk, and destiny of the Church.”
Jews don’t need JESUS
Dispensationalism teaches that modern unbelieving Jews
do not have to accept JESUS to be saved. Dispensationalism claims that non-believing
Jews will be saved in eternity according to OT covenant promises that are supposedly still
in effect from their “dispensation.” Again, this is a direct contradiction of
scripture – which says that the only way to GOD is through JESUS. Joh 14:6 Dispensationalism teaches that Christians will be saved in heaven while
the Jews will be segregated to an earthly kingdom. The BIBLE actually says that
the church is one “new man” composed of Jew and Gentile; that the combined church body is Israel.
The
Rapture will be a secret
Dispensationalists
teach a secret / pre-tribulation
rapture and more than one “second coming.” According to dispensational doctrine,
Christians will be taken away suddenly (raptured) without warning, and no one
will know what happened to them. The BIBLE does not teach either a secret
rapture or a pre-tribulation rapture. (At Rev 4:1, Scofield
adds a note that is erroneously related to the rapture of the church – i.e., “come
up here".) The BIBLE actually says that there will be unmistakable signs worldwide
before the second coming of JESUS - that HE will appear like lightening;
lighting up the sky from east to west. IOW not secret.
Dispensationalism’s highly
speculative and unreasonably specific outline of the end-time scenario has led large
factions of the church to accept the eisegesis represented in popular fiction
like the Late Great Planet Earth and the Left Behind Series as being
representative of Biblical truth. Some dispensational thought demands that
secular Jews populate Israel in order to be slaughtered in the end time battle
of Armageddon; where only a small number of Jews will supposedly survive to
populate a segregated millennial kingdom on earth – with all Christians having
been conveniently transported to heaven. Matthew 24:27
Slavery and Racism were and
are justified
Scofield’s bible notes justify anti-black racism and support white supremacy. Scofield’s note at Gen 9 boldly restates a pre-civil war false interpretation that was used
to justify chattel slavery.
According
to the false interpretation, Noah (the father of all the races) curses his son Ham
(who according to
the BIBLE is the father/ancestor
of the races that initially
inhabited parts of the middle
east and Africa. Slavers and racists falsely claimed that this curse gave them
biblical justification to use Africans as slaves because all Africans had supposedly been cursed through Ham. In his note at Gen 9, Scofield claims that (my additions in parentheses):
(5) A prophetic declaration is made that from Ham will descend an
inferior and servile posterity Gen_9:24; Gen_9:25. (He means the enslaved Africans in America and their
descendants.)
(7) A prophetic declaration is made that from Japheth (supposedly the
white northern European races) will descend the "enlarged" races Gen_9:27. Government, science, and art, speaking
broadly, are and have been Japhetic, so that history is the indisputable record
of the exact fulfilment of these declarations. (Note that this could only be considered to
be true from a historically and geographically ignorant Eurocentric viewpoint.)
The actual story in the BIBLE can be summarized thus: Noah got drunk. Noah’s son Ham saw him passed out, naked in his tent. For
an unstated reason,
this led to Noah proclaiming a curse against Canaan, Ham’s son. Noah said that Canaan would be a servant
to his brothers, Shem and Japheth. The GOD of Shem was blessed (inferring that Shem was
blessed). GOD would make
space for Japheth (enlarge) and Japheth would live in the tents of Shem.
·
Note that Ham had three other sons who were not cursed.
· The word translated as “slave” here is often shown as
“servant” in the OT. Throughout the BIBLE, the words
for slave and servant are often interchangeable.
· No one really knows
what the word translated as “enlarged” actually infers in this context.
Why Gen 9 has nothing to do with modern chattel slavery
The following
is an (incomplete) outline of reasons why Gen 9:20-27 has nothing to do with modern chattel slavery and in no way
justifies or excuses the horrific (satanic) evils of the trans-Atlantic slave
trade:
1.
First
and foremost, Ham was not cursed and neither were his other three sons. Lazy (or
malicious) commentators often repeat the phrase: “GOD cursed Ham.” GOD did
not curse Ham. Noah did not curse Ham either. In fact, it can be
deduced from Gen 9 that Noah couldn’t have cursed Ham because GOD had already
blessed him.
2.
No
one knows what Ham and/or Canaan did that caused Noah to curse Canaan. The
actual offense and who committed it is so vague that the meaning of this episode has been a source of (often wild) speculation since ancient times. The Rabbis had many theories, but often ended up just blaming Noah for getting pass-out drunk in the first place.
3.
At Gen
10 the BIBLE shows how the sons and grandsons of Shem, Ham and Japheth became
the progenitors of the various nations around the Mediterranean and south into Africa.
4.
Ham’s
descendants are shown as settling to the east in Iraq and Arabia, in Palestine, west across Mediterranean
Africa, and south into Egypt and Ethiopia. Canaan’s descendants were the people
living in Palestine who the Israelites displaced when they escaped slavery in
Egypt. The Israelites had already mixed with the Hamite Egyptians – e.g., Moses’
second wife was an African. Num 12:1
5.
Many
commentators over the centuries have contended that the displacement of the
Canaanites was the final fulfillment of the curse against Canaan. The OT treats
the rest of Ham’s descendants in the same way it treats the other nations. Note
that individuals and groups from all the Mediterranean nations had been enslaved
at one time or another.
6.
When
Noah blesses Japheth, saying that GOD will make a place for him, can any
reasonable person actually believe (as Scofield implies) that it means that 3500
years later, northern Europeans will be justified in using any means necessary
to rape the world of its material goods?
7.
Here
are a series of quotes from an article posted at conservative, reformed TGC about
the false interpretations about the “curse of Ham.” It provides mainstream
denominational agreement with all that I have written above:
…there is no curse of Ham in Genesis 9 or anywhere else in the Bible.
…the “biblical” doctrine used to justify the enslavement of dark-skinned
peoples is completely fabricated and has no exegetical warrant. (I.e., it is not
taught in the BIBLE.)
…prior to 1865 …The curse served as a prooftext for pro-slavery
preachers, enabling them to make heavenly sounding justifications for the
hellish enslavement of dark-skinned image-bearers (of GOD).
…Patrick Mell (1814–1888), the fourth president of the Southern Baptist
Convention, proposed: “From Ham were descended the nations that occupied the
land of Canaan and those that now constitute the African or Negro race. Their
inheritance, according to prophecy, has been and will continue to be slavery .
. . [and] so long as we have the Bible . . . we expect to maintain it.”
…Satan is a master of Scripture-twisting (Matt. 4:1–11). He is the
deceiver behind false teachers who serve his purposes by “disguising themselves
as . . . servants of righteousness” (2 Cor. 11:13–15). Given both its lack of
exegetical warrant and its evil fruit, “the curse of Ham” interpretation can
only be described as a “doctrine of demons” (1 Tim. 4:1–3).
…(Although) slavery was abolished in 1865, echoes of this false doctrine
continued to reverberate throughout America’s culture and churches. Prominent
pastors used it to support segregation, and its sentiments fuel modern-day
white supremacist theology.
What would JESUS Say?
The
Europeans, who like all conquers attacked people in order to steal their stuff, decided that their success meant that they were not only destined to rule but were justified in their conquests, regardless of the utterly anti-Christian methods that they used. Methods
which, as we see from this episode, included the blasphemous and hypocritical misuse of BIBLE texts to justify themselves.
The heretical misinterpretation of Gen 9 contradicts everything that JESUS
commands in the New Testament – it deviously attempts to use an obscure OT
passage to justify actions that are deadly soul-destroying sins – especially according
to the NT.
Americans had the BIBLE to tell them that it was wrong when they decided to use chattel slavery and
genocide to get rich. There is no excuse – then or now. People who today are
getting their sense of self-worth from racism and nationalism still have the option
to repent before it is too late.
Conclusion
Dispensationalism
is so internally contradictory, that it has been revised over the years to try
to bring some of its more heretical teachings in line with the mainstream. (I
say this to anticipate the arguments from modern dispensationalists who claim that
they have corrected many of the errors of the classical dispensationalists.)
My question
however is this: Why stay loyal to a system that you acknowledge was faulty
from its origin?
Dispensational
doctrine has had a far-reaching impact on the world view of many fundamentalist
Christian denominations – continuing to encourage them to ignore the main
commandment of the NT – to love your neighbor as yourself.