The next several blog entries will re-examine
the "Once Saved Always Saved" (OSAS) doctrine (and its variations), as taught in
many modern American churches. The BIBLE verses typically used by proponents of
OSAS to teach "unconditional eternal security" will be contrasted with the BIBLE verses
that almost always accompany them; verses which add Christlikeness and
obedience as requirements for final salvation. Note that I am not promoting a
‘works gospel’ – the idea that you must add works of ritual religion to the
grace offered by JESUS to be saved. An upcoming article will address the grace
vs works argument. (Please review the definitions below.)
It is extremely important that Christians begin to understand that the
verses used for and against the unconditional security doctrine do not contradict
each other. These verses reinforce each other in a way that presents a greater
truth to the teachable reader. See Bob Utley’s teaching
about how the ancient Hebrews presented spiritual “truths in seemingly
contradictory pairs (paradox)” in order to encourage the hearer to contemplate GOD’s character.
Once Saved Always Saved
vs What the BIBLE Actually Says
Many modern Christians have been taught that
once they accept JESUS, they are saved and on their way to heaven. They are often
told that there are no other conditions, and that no sins committed after their
initial decision for CHRIST can cause them to lose their salvation.
This doctrine (teaching) is generally referred
to as “unconditional eternal security." The popular variations of
this teaching were derived from the Calvinist (Reformed) doctrine known as “Preservation
of the Saints.” Various denominations teach unconditional security as “Preservation
of the Saints,” “Once Saved Always Saved” (OSAS), and “Hyper-Grace /
Free-Grace.”
Even though none of the early disciples believed in or promoted the unconditional eternal security doctrine, many modern people have adopted it and are determined to hold onto it - especially those who only listen to the BIBLE verses that seem to support it. That said, there are many other BIBLE verses that present additional requirements for salvation - requirements beyond just believing. Some of these verses give stern warnings to believers about the possibility of losing their salvation. The modern church takes the fear of GOD out of the salvation equation when such verses are ignored or explained away by unconditional security teachers - even the Sermon on the Mount is scorned by some OSAS believers.
But what if OSAS does
not present everything the BIBLE teaches about the salvation process?
It is my contention that
much of the vicious hypocrisy and general un-Christlikeness in the American Right-Wing
Political church can be attributed to OSAS. Their teaching and belief is that
there is no reason to fear eternal punishment for willful sin because, according to
OSAS, their salvation cannot be lost in any case.
The question I seek to address is whether believers who willfully and unrepentantly hold on to hateful worldly attitudes will be allowed in the kingdom of heaven? There are many BIBLE verses, plainly aimed at the
original followers of CHRIST, that warned them (after they had been saved) to
repent or be lost. Are people putting their eternal salvation at risk when they
pick and choose which commandments they will obey?
In coming posts, I will provide biblegateway links to all of the
popular BIBLE verses used to teach unconditional security, as well as to those
verses which show that the promise of salvation has conditions beyond just
believing. At the biblegateway
links, you can (and should) click on “Read full chapter” to see the full
context of each verse. You can also read and compare the verses using any of
the BIBLE translations available from the dropdown list. Remember, you are
responsible to work out your own salvation. Phi 2:12
Definitions:
Calvinism
– One of the original protestant denominations, named after its founder John
Calvin (d. 1564). It stresses a belief in GOD’s sovereignty / total control
over everything, including predetermining people’s actions – both good and
evil. According to Calvinism, although man does not have a free will, he is still
held responsible for his sin. This is not consistent with GOD’s justice as
taught in the BIBLE or the teachings of the original disciples.
Calvinism was influenced by ancient pagan philosophies and teaches an “unchangeable fate”, i.e., that some people are destined to be saved
and some are born to be damned, regardless of what they do in life. This is referred
to as double predestination.
When people first accept Calvinism, they tend to
believe that they must be part of the “elect,” i.e., those chosen to be saved.
However, as Calvinists continue to learn the fine points of their doctrine, some
begin to have a faith crisis revolving around the doctrine of predestination. They
wonder if they actually are among the saved. One of the lesser-known Calvinist doctrines
is called Lordship Salvation, where in keeping with perseverance, GOD
supposedly forces the “elect” to maintain their salvation through some sort of
automatic, ingrained obedience. This idea causes many Calvinists to feel the
need to prove their elect status by actually being sinless, which of course, is
impossible. Hence, when supposedly elect Calvinists do sin, they begin to
question whether they are really saved. Even Charles Spurgeon (d. 1892), the
most famous Calvinist preacher, other than Calvin himself and his successor
Beza, wrote about periodically doubting his salvation.
Perseverance of the
Saints / Unconditional Election – Two of the five main points of
the Calvinist belief system; i.e., GOD chooses certain people at
random to be saved who can’t lose their salvation for any reason (a
form of predestination). Note that not every person who regards themselves as a
“Calvinist” agrees with all five points of the system.
OSAS / Once Saved Always
Saved - A modern simplified version of the Calvinist doctrines of
unconditional election, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints. The
non-Calvinist forms of unconditional election are generally thought to have
been derived from the doctrine of “Perseverance of the Saints.”
OSAS is typically taught in Baptist
churches which are not affiliated with one of the mainline reformed (openly
Calvinist) denominations. OSAS generally means making a one-time confession of
Christian belief after which, the person is permanently saved and any sins
committed after confession can’t cause them to lose their salvation. Essentially
it is like signing a contract where one party has to fulfill their promise (GOD
has to bring you to heaven) but the second party doesn’t have to fulfill theirs
(you never “really” have to repent or change who you are and stop sinning
willfully). This sort of “easy believism” is often referred to as “fire
insurance”, i.e., an easy, convenient, self-justifying way to try to avoid hell.
Grace
– Undeserved favorable treatment from GOD – a gift. In the context of salvation,
the BIBLE says we are saved by Grace through faith (in JESUS). Meaning that GOD
offers us salvation for free, not because we have done anything to deserve it, but
because HE wants us to be with HIM for eternity, if we agree to respect
and obey the work of JESUS. In an upcoming post in this series, we will see how
some OSAS teachers falsely claim that holiness and obedience are “works” that
somehow oppose the free grace (forgiveness) offered by JESUS.
Hyper-grace
- A recent, even more heretical version of OSAS where “believers” apparently only
have to privately accept JESUS in their minds, for all “past, present, and
even future” sins to be cancelled. Ongoing confession, repentance, and
obedience are not considered to be requirements for salvation!
In a way, hyper-grace is not an unexpected
development. Like other modern objections to Christianity, it is just a shiny
new version of an ancient heresy that was refuted long ago. That heresy became
known as antinominianism during the reformation (1500’s). Anti-nominian-ism
literally means “anti-law or no law” and was/is related to Gnosticism. Both of these
pagan philosophies encouraged early believers to disobey the commandments of
JESUS; offering false, unbiblical methods of salvation.
Modern hyper-grace is similar, implying that
since Christians are no longer under the Old Testament law, and because all sin is
covered by New Testament grace, there is really no need to follow any of
the commandments in the BIBLE. As such, hyper-grace is a ridiculous
contradiction of all Scripture. Rom 6
Even so, it is unusual to see a church openly
practicing a “anything goes” doctrine, but many will admit, if pressed, that
this is the bottom line of their (false) doctrine: “that although people should try not
to sin, since they can’t or won’t stop, they shouldn’t worry about it – they will
be saved anyway.”
Justification
– Judged by GOD as being free of guilt and therefore acceptable to HIM. (See
the parable of the tax collector and the Pharisee, Luk 18:9-14. The sinful tax
collector humbled himself before GOD and was justified.)
Sanctification
– The ongoing process of sanctification (becoming
a saint) is the process of becoming Christlike and is for all Christians. Col 3:5 You come to JESUS as you are - but then the sincere repentant believer is supposed to begin a life-long process of separating
themselves from worldly things and dedicating themselves to GOD. John the
Baptist challenged the Pharisees to show fruit worthy of repentance (behavior
showing that they had actually changed). OSAS teaching infers that seeking
holiness is not necessary for salvation, with some even teaching that obedience
is an attempt at salvation by works, that rejects the grace of JESUS.
Fully agreed.
ReplyDelete